On 01/13/2012 04:31 AM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Richard, > >> Not an ideal solution, since the availability of this pattern implies >> it's extremely cheap, and we'll replace jumps to the epilogue with >> this pattern. >> Or to define an availability predicate similar to i386, testing if >> the epilogue is trivial, and only a return insn is needed. > > Something like the attached ? > > I am running some local checks now and if there are no regressions then I > will check the patch in tomorrow.
Looks good, thanks. r~
