OK.

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, H.J. Lu wrote:

>       PR other/98027
>       * doc/install: Default to --enable-cet=auto.
> ---
>  gcc/doc/install.texi | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> index 5f879ca4cea..021c347cc09 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
> @@ -2259,11 +2259,10 @@ instrumentation, see @option{-fcf-protection} option. 
>  When
>  to add @option{-fcf-protection} and, if needed, other target
>  specific options to a set of building options.
>  
> -The option is disabled by default.  When @code{--enable-cet=auto}
> -is used, it is enabled on Linux/x86 if target binutils
> -supports @code{Intel CET} instructions and disabled otherwise.
> -In this case the target libraries are configured to get additional
> -@option{-fcf-protection} option.
> +@code{--enable-cet=auto} is default.  CET is enabled on Linux/x86 if
> +target binutils supports @code{Intel CET} instructions and disabled
> +otherwise.  In this case, the target libraries are configured to get
> +additional @option{-fcf-protection} option.
>  
>  @item --with-riscv-attribute=@samp{yes}, @samp{no} or @samp{default}
>  Generate RISC-V attribute by default, in order to record extra build
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imend

Reply via email to