On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 14:24, Stam Markianos-Wright via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A while back I submitted GCC10 commit:
>
>   44f77a6dea2f312ee1743f3dde465c1b8453ee13
>
> for PR91816.
>
> Turns out I was an idiot and forgot to include the test in the actual
> git commit, even my entire patch had been approved.
>
> Tested that the test still passes on a cross arm-none-eabi and also in a
> Cortex A-15 bootstrap with no regressions.
>
> Submitting this as Obvious to gcc-11 and backporting to gcc-10.
>

Hi,

This new test fails when forcing -mcpu=cortex-m3/4/5/7/33:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr91816.c scan-assembler-times beq\\t.L[0-9] 2
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr91816.c scan-assembler-times beq\\t.Lbcond[0-9] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr91816.c scan-assembler-times bne\\t.L[0-9] 2
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr91816.c scan-assembler-times bne\\t.Lbcond[0-9] 1

I didn't check manually what is generated, can you have a look?

Thanks,

Christophe




> Thanks,
> Stam Markianos-Wright
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>         PR target/91816
>         * gcc.target/arm/pr91816.c: New test.

Reply via email to