Hello.

As mentioned in the PR, we used to prefer BT over JT in switch expansion.
I restore the behavior to that.

Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/97736
        * tree-switch-conversion.c 
(switch_decision_tree::analyze_switch_statement):
        Prefer bit tests.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/97736
        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c: Prefer bit tests.
        * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C  | 12 ++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c |  6 +++---
 gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c             |  8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bda77e7e165
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr97736.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/97736 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { { x86_64-*-* aarch64-*-* ia64-*-* powerpc64-*-* } 
&& lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-switchlower1" } */
+
+bool is_vowel(char c) {
+    switch (c)
+  case'a':case'e':case'i':case'o':case'u':
+      return true;
+      return false;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: BT:97-117" 
"switchlower1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c
index 149687ca2bb..6f70c9de0c1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/switch-1.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int foo3 (int x)
   }
 }
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: JT:0-62" "switchlower1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: BT:0-62" 
"switchlower1" } } */
int foo4 (int x)
 {
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int foo4 (int x)
   }
 }
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: -100 JT:10-62 600-700" "switchlower1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: -100 BT:10-62 600-700" 
"switchlower1" } } */
int foo5 (int x)
 {
@@ -107,4 +107,4 @@ int foo5 (int x)
   }
 }
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: JT:10-62 600-700 JT:1000-1021 111111" "switchlower1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ";; GIMPLE switch case clusters: BT:10-62 600-700 JT:1000-1021 
111111" "switchlower1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c
index 426462e856b..a7c5df31743 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c
@@ -1743,8 +1743,8 @@ switch_decision_tree::analyze_switch_statement ()
reset_out_edges_aux (m_switch); - /* Find jump table clusters. */
-  vec<cluster *> output = jump_table_cluster::find_jump_tables (clusters);
+  /* Find bit-test clusters.  */
+  vec<cluster *> output = bit_test_cluster::find_bit_tests (clusters);
/* Find bit test clusters. */
   vec<cluster *> output2;
@@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::analyze_switch_statement ()
        {
          if (!tmp.is_empty ())
            {
-             vec<cluster *> n = bit_test_cluster::find_bit_tests (tmp);
+             vec<cluster *> n = jump_table_cluster::find_jump_tables (tmp);
              output2.safe_splice (n);
              n.release ();
              tmp.truncate (0);
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::analyze_switch_statement ()
   /* We still can have a temporary vector to test.  */
   if (!tmp.is_empty ())
     {
-      vec<cluster *> n = bit_test_cluster::find_bit_tests (tmp);
+      vec<cluster *> n = jump_table_cluster::find_jump_tables (tmp);
       output2.safe_splice (n);
       n.release ();
     }
--
2.29.2

Reply via email to