*ping*
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Oktober 2020 um 20:44 Uhr > Von: "Harald Anlauf" <anl...@gmx.de> > An: "fortran" <fort...@gcc.gnu.org>, "gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> > Betreff: [PATCH] PR fortran/95979 - [10/11 Regression] ICE in get_kind, at > fortran/simplify.c:129 > > Dear all, > > the present PR turned out to be fixable rather easily, once Paul had the > idea to add another attempt of simplification of elemental intrinsics > for array-valued arguments. There was some fallout which required only > small adjustments, see commit message below. > > Regtested cleanly on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > OK for master / 10-branch? > > Thanks, > Harald > > > PR fortran/95979 - ICE in get_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:129 > > Simplification of the elemental intrinsic INDEX with constant array-valued > arguments failed with an ICE or did not reduce to a constant array, depending > also on the presence of the optional KIND argument. Add a further attempt of > simplification in the case of elemental intrinsics, and make sure the KIND > argument is not removed prematurely during simplification of INDEX. > > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/95979 > * expr.c (gfc_check_init_expr): Fix check of return code from > gfc_intrinsic_func_interface. > * intrinsic.c (gfc_intrinsic_func_interface): Add further attempt > of simplification of elemental intrinsics with array arguments. > * iresolve.c (gfc_resolve_index_func): Keep optional KIND argument > for simplification of elemental use of INDEX. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/95979 > * gfortran.dg/index_4.f90: New test. > >
