On 9/24/20 1:53 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Finally, unless both a type and function with the same name exist in the same scope there is no reason to mention the class-id when referencing a class name. I.e., this value_range_equiv *allocate_value_range_equiv (); void free_value_range_equiv (value_range_equiv *); is the same as this: class value_range_equiv *allocate_value_range_equiv (); void free_value_range_equiv (class value_range_equiv *); but the former is shorter and clearer (and in line with existing practice).
value_range_equiv may not be defined in the scope of range-query.h, so that is why the class specifier is there.
Aldy
