Hi! The following testcase is miscompiled on i686-linux, because we try to expand a double-word bitwise logic operation with op0 being a (mem:DI u) and target (mem:DI u+4), i.e. partial overlap, and thus end up with: movl 4(%esp), %eax andl u, %eax movl %eax, u+4 ! movl u+4, %eax optimized out andl 8(%esp), %eax movl %eax, u+8 rather than with the desired: movl 4(%esp), %edx movl 8(%esp), %eax andl u, %edx andl u+4, %eax movl %eax, u+8 movl %edx, u+4 because the store of the first word to target overwrites the second word of the operand. expand_binop for this (and several similar places) already check for target == op0 or target == op1, this patch just adds reg_overlap_mentioned_p calls next to it. Pedantically, at least for some of these it might be sufficient to force a different target if there is overlap but target is not rtx_equal_p to the operand (e.g. in this bitwise logical case, but e.g. not in the shift cases where there is reordering), though that would go against the preexisting target == op? checks and the rationale that REG_EQUAL notes in that case isn't correct.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk and release branches? 2020-09-18 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/97073 * optabs.c (expand_binop, expand_absneg_bit, expand_unop, expand_copysign_bit): Check reg_overlap_mentioned_p between target and operand(s) and if it returns true, force a pseudo as target. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr97073.c: New test. --- gcc/optabs.c.jj 2020-07-28 15:39:09.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/optabs.c 2020-09-17 22:07:53.238396458 +0200 @@ -1395,6 +1395,8 @@ expand_binop (machine_mode mode, optab b if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1 + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op1) || !valid_multiword_target_p (target)) target = gen_reg_rtx (int_mode); @@ -1475,6 +1477,8 @@ expand_binop (machine_mode mode, optab b if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1 + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op1) || !valid_multiword_target_p (target)) target = gen_reg_rtx (int_mode); @@ -1533,6 +1537,8 @@ expand_binop (machine_mode mode, optab b || target == op0 || target == op1 || !REG_P (target) + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op1) || !valid_multiword_target_p (target)) target = gen_reg_rtx (int_mode); @@ -2670,6 +2676,7 @@ expand_absneg_bit (enum rtx_code code, s if (target == 0 || target == op0 + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) || (nwords > 1 && !valid_multiword_target_p (target))) target = gen_reg_rtx (mode); @@ -2951,7 +2958,10 @@ expand_unop (machine_mode mode, optab un int i; rtx_insn *insns; - if (target == 0 || target == op0 || !valid_multiword_target_p (target)) + if (target == 0 + || target == op0 + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) + || !valid_multiword_target_p (target)) target = gen_reg_rtx (int_mode); start_sequence (); @@ -3472,6 +3482,8 @@ expand_copysign_bit (scalar_float_mode m if (target == 0 || target == op0 || target == op1 + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op0) + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (target, op1) || (nwords > 1 && !valid_multiword_target_p (target))) target = gen_reg_rtx (mode); --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr97073.c.jj 2020-09-17 22:00:39.778614611 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr97073.c 2020-09-17 22:06:08.870893863 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +/* PR middle-end/97073 */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-mno-stv" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */ + +typedef unsigned long long L; +union U { L i; struct T { unsigned k; L l; } j; } u; + +__attribute__((noinline,noclone)) void +foo (L x) +{ + u.j.l = u.i & x; +} + +int +main () +{ + u.i = 5; + foo (-1ULL); + if (u.j.l != 5) + __builtin_abort (); + return 0; +} Jakub