On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:29 PM Eric Botcazou <botca...@adacore.com> wrote: > > > So it breaks PR93199 again? > > Indeed, although there is no regression in the testsuite AFAICS.
Yeah, too big of a testcase ... > I guess that > we can do the new walk before and not instead of the post-order traversal. > > Revised patch attached, same ChangeLog. If that avoids the compile-time regression it's fine. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Eric Botcazou
