On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:04 PM Austin Morton <austinpmor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The patch misses documentation of the pragma. > > This was an intentional omission - when looking for documentation of > the pragma in clang I found none. > > If we do want to document the pragmas in GCC: > - what section of the documentation would that go in? > - gcc/doc/cpp.texi, section 7, "Pragmas" > - this section states: "This manual documents the pragmas > which are meaningful to the preprocessor itself. Other pragmas are > meaningful to the C or C++ compilers. They are documented in the GCC > manual." > - these pragmas aren't exactly meaningful to the preprocessor > _or_ the C/C++ compiler, so it's not exactly clear where they fit. > - gcc/doc/extend.texi, section 6.62, "Pragmas Accepted by GCC" > - what exactly would it say? > - I guess just mention the existence and that they won't trigger > unknown pragma warnings? They don't _do_ anything
Yes, documenting their existance and their zero effect. Richard. > > Austin
