On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:47 AM Richard Biener
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:40 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Reject target("no-general-regs-only") pragma and attribute.
>
> mgeneral-regs-only
> Target Report RejectNegative Mask(GENERAL_REGS_ONLY) Var(ix86_target_flags)
> Save
> Generate code which uses only the general registers.
>
> it has already RejectNegative - why's that not honored? Is this a general
> issue?
>
target("no-general-regs-only") needs to be handled separately.
--
H.J.
