Hello-

The attached patch was discussed briefly on PR 54185 here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54185#c14
The test case for this PR sometimes fails due to random failures in
pthread_create() that are not related to the original PR. This patch fixes
it up by ignoring those failures. The test case was designed to repeat the
same test 1000 times to attempt to reproduce a race condition, so I think is
OK if some of those iterations are simply skipped.

Thanks for taking a look at it; I can commit it if it makes sense.

-Lewis
libstdc++: testsuite: Address random failure in pthread_create() [PR54185]

The test for this PR calls pthread_create() many times in a row, which may fail
with EAGAIN sometimes. Avoid generating a test failure in this case.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        PR libstdc++/54185
        * testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc: Make test robust
        to random pthread_create() failures.

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
index ea0d5bb8740..cbd21e11e57 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
@@ -31,19 +31,25 @@
 std::condition_variable* cond = nullptr;
 std::mutex mx;
 int started = 0;
+bool notified = false;
 int constexpr NUM_THREADS = 10;
 
+static void finalize_cond()
+{
+  /* Lock should be held when calling this.  */
+  notified = true;
+  cond->notify_all();
+  delete cond;
+  cond = nullptr;
+}
+
 void do_thread_a()
 {
   std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(mx);
   if(++started >= NUM_THREADS)
-  {
-    cond->notify_all();
-    delete cond;
-    cond = nullptr;
-  }
+    finalize_cond();
   else
-    cond->wait(lock);
+    cond->wait(lock, [] { return notified; });
 }
 
 int main(){
@@ -51,11 +57,24 @@ int main(){
   for(int j = 0; j < 1000; ++j)
   {
     started = 0;
+    notified = false;
     cond = new std::condition_variable;
     for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; ++i)
-      vec.emplace_back(&do_thread_a);
-    for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; ++i)
-      vec[i].join();
+      {
+       try
+         {
+           vec.emplace_back(&do_thread_a);
+         }
+       catch(const std::system_error&)
+         {
+           /* Thread creation may fail due to resource limits; just move on.  
*/
+           std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(mx);
+           finalize_cond();
+           break;
+         }
+      }
+    for(auto& thread: vec)
+      thread.join();
     vec.clear();
   }
 }

Reply via email to