Hi! In debug stmts, we are less strict about what is and what is not accepted there, so this patch just punts on optimization of a debug stmt rather than ICEing.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2020-08-04 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR debug/96354 * gimple-fold.c (maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr): Add IS_DEBUG argument. Return false instead of gcc_unreachable if it is true and get_addr_base_and_unit_offset returns NULL. (fold_stmt_1) <case GIMPLE_DEBUG>: Adjust caller. * g++.dg/opt/pr96354.C: New test. --- gcc/gimple-fold.c.jj 2020-07-28 15:39:09.908757602 +0200 +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c 2020-08-03 13:23:57.579436442 +0200 @@ -4875,7 +4875,7 @@ replace_stmt_with_simplification (gimple /* Canonicalize MEM_REFs invariant address operand after propagation. */ static bool -maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr (tree *t) +maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr (tree *t, bool is_debug = false) { bool res = false; tree *orig_t = t; @@ -4939,7 +4939,11 @@ maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr (tree *t base = get_addr_base_and_unit_offset (TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0), &coffset); if (!base) - gcc_unreachable (); + { + if (is_debug) + return false; + gcc_unreachable (); + } TREE_OPERAND (*t, 0) = build_fold_addr_expr (base); TREE_OPERAND (*t, 1) = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, @@ -5119,7 +5123,7 @@ fold_stmt_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, if (*val && (REFERENCE_CLASS_P (*val) || TREE_CODE (*val) == ADDR_EXPR) - && maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr (val)) + && maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr (val, true)) changed = true; } break; --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr96354.C.jj 2020-07-29 11:25:15.701164242 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr96354.C 2020-07-29 11:26:16.490291018 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// PR debug/96354 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-O2 -g -fopenmp-simd" } + +template <int N> struct A { typedef double T[N]; }; +template <int N> struct B { typename A<N>::T b; double *baz () { return b; } }; +template <int N> struct C { B<N> d; C (); }; +template <int N> C<N>::C () { double c = *d.baz (); } +template <int N> void operator- (C<N>, const C<N> &); +template <int> struct D {}; +template <int N, int M> C<N> foo (D<N>, C<M>) { C<N> t; return t; } +int e; +struct E { D<3> d; void bar (); }; + +void +E::bar () +{ +#pragma omp simd + for (int i = 0; i < e; i++) + { + C<3> f, g; + g - foo (d, f); + } +} Jakub