Dear Paul, On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:30:28PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64/FC9 - OK for trunk?
OK. Thanks for the patch. > + /* If we find a deferred typebound procedure, check for derived types > + that an over-riding typebound procedure has not been missed. */ s/over-riding/overriding/. (I somehow miss something before "that" - such as "ensuring" or similar.) > + if (e->value.compcall.tbp->deferred > + && e->value.compcall.name > + && !e->value.compcall.tbp->non_overridable > + && e->value.compcall.base_object > + && e->value.compcall.base_object->ts.type == BT_DERIVED) Indentation looks wrong. While I also tend to reduce the number of run tests, it probably makes sense to follow Thomas' suggestion and add a new test case instead of modifying the old one. Tobias ----- End forwarded message -----
