> As you see, I really do not like to have another RTX class, without very > well defined semantics even. Not without first being shown no > alternatives are acceptable, anyway :-)
Seconded. -- Eric Botcazou
> As you see, I really do not like to have another RTX class, without very > well defined semantics even. Not without first being shown no > alternatives are acceptable, anyway :-)
Seconded. -- Eric Botcazou