Fix test cases assumptions that target has alignment constraints.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c: Unpacked may still have alignment of 1
on targets with default_packed.
* gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c: Remove AVR target filter and replace
with default_packed filter.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
index 796724bb950..01fae3f78d4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-copy-4.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ extern const struct PackedA packed;
struct Unpacked { int i; char c; };
Assert (__alignof (struct Unpacked) > 1);
+/* { dg-error "size of array .* is negative" "" { target default_packed } .-1
} */
/* Verify that copying the packed attribute to the declaration
of an object is ignored with a warning. (There should be
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
index 3c9cf55756e..6a0d4248f1b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c11-align-9.c
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
are at least some alignment constraints), case of compound literals. */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-std=c11 -pedantic-errors" } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "no alignment constraints" { "avr-*-*" } } */
#include <stddef.h>
-max_align_t *p = &(_Alignas (_Alignof (char)) max_align_t) { 1 }; /* {
dg-error "reduce alignment" } */
+max_align_t *p = &(_Alignas (_Alignof (char)) max_align_t) { 1 };
+/* { dg-error "reduce alignment" "" { target { ! default_packed } } .-1 } */
--
2.20.1
