On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:52:33AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:54:26PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:36:51PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > > > * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (cpu_is_info) <power10>: New. > > > <mma>: Remove unneeded ','. > > > > The comma helps making the diff less for future additions (and, makes > > merging/refactoring easier, that way). A trailing comma was not allowed > > with older C standards (or just with some implementations?), but it > > should be fine with C++11 as we require now. Is there something I am > > missing here? > > A trailing comma has always been allowed for structure and array > initializations. Where it is not allowed is for enumeration names.
It is allowed even there since C99. But GCC never required C99 for the host compiler, and C++ didn't get this feature until C++11, which we require since a little over a month now! Freedom at last! ;-) Segher
