"Kewen.Lin" <[email protected]> writes:
> @@ -5167,6 +5167,24 @@ mode @var{n}.
>
> This pattern is not allowed to @code{FAIL}.
>
> +@cindex @code{lenload@var{m}} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{lenload@var{m}}
> +Perform a vector load with length from memory operand 1 of mode @var{m}
> +into register operand 0. Length is provided in register operand 2 with
> +appropriate mode which should afford the maximal required precision of
> +any available lengths.
I think we need to say in more detail what “load with length” actually
means. How about:
Load the number of bytes specified by operand 2 from memory operand 1
into register operand 0, setting the other bytes of operand 0 to
undefined values. Operands 0 and 1 have mode @var{m}. Operand 2 has
whichever integer mode the target prefers.
> +@cindex @code{lenstore@var{m}} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{lenstore@var{m}}
> +Perform a vector store with length from register operand 1 of mode @var{m}
> +into memory operand 0. Length is provided in register operand 2 with
> +appropriate mode which should afford the maximal required precision of
> +any available lengths.
Similarly here:
Store the number of bytes specified by operand 2 from nonmemory operand 1
into memory operand 0, leaving the other bytes of operand 0 unchanged.
Operands 0 and 1 have mode @var{m}. Operand 2 has whichever integer
mode the target prefers.
> @@ -2478,7 +2480,7 @@ expand_call_mem_ref (tree type, gcall *stmt, int index)
> return fold_build2 (MEM_REF, type, addr, build_int_cst (alias_ptr_type,
> 0));
> }
>
> -/* Expand MASK_LOAD{,_LANES} call STMT using optab OPTAB. */
> +/* Expand MASK_LOAD{,_LANES} and LEN_LOAD call STMT using optab OPTAB. */
s/and/or/.
>
> static void
> expand_mask_load_optab_fn (internal_fn, gcall *stmt, convert_optab optab)
Think it would be worth generalising the name, e.g. to
expand_partial_load_optab_fn, and adding a #define for
expand_mask_load_optab_fn before the other two #defines.
Same comments for stores.
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.def b/gcc/internal-fn.def
> index 1d190d492ff..ed6561f296a 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.def
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.def
> @@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> - load_lanes: currently just vec_load_lanes
> - mask_load_lanes: currently just vec_mask_load_lanes
> - gather_load: used for {mask_,}gather_load
> + - len_load: currently just lenload
>
> - mask_store: currently just maskstore
> - store_lanes: currently just vec_store_lanes
> - mask_store_lanes: currently just vec_mask_store_lanes
> - scatter_store: used for {mask_,}scatter_store
> + - len_store: currently just lenstore
>
> - unary: a normal unary optab, such as vec_reverse_<mode>
> - binary: a normal binary optab, such as vec_interleave_lo_<mode>
> @@ -127,6 +129,8 @@ DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (GATHER_LOAD, ECF_PURE,
> gather_load, gather_load)
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (MASK_GATHER_LOAD, ECF_PURE,
> mask_gather_load, gather_load)
>
> +DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (LEN_LOAD, ECF_PURE, lenload, len_load)
> +
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (SCATTER_STORE, 0, scatter_store, scatter_store)
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (MASK_SCATTER_STORE, 0,
> mask_scatter_store, scatter_store)
> @@ -136,6 +140,8 @@ DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (STORE_LANES, ECF_CONST,
> vec_store_lanes, store_lanes)
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (MASK_STORE_LANES, 0,
> vec_mask_store_lanes, mask_store_lanes)
>
> +DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (LEN_STORE, 0, lenstore, len_store)
> +
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (WHILE_ULT, ECF_CONST | ECF_NOTHROW, while_ult, while)
> DEF_INTERNAL_OPTAB_FN (CHECK_RAW_PTRS, ECF_CONST | ECF_NOTHROW,
> check_raw_ptrs, check_ptrs)
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def
> index 0c64eb52a8d..9fe4ac1840d 100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs.def
> +++ b/gcc/optabs.def
> @@ -435,3 +435,5 @@ OPTAB_D (check_war_ptrs_optab, "check_war_ptrs$a")
> OPTAB_DC (vec_duplicate_optab, "vec_duplicate$a", VEC_DUPLICATE)
> OPTAB_DC (vec_series_optab, "vec_series$a", VEC_SERIES)
> OPTAB_D (vec_shl_insert_optab, "vec_shl_insert_$a")
> +OPTAB_D (lenload_optab, "lenload$a")
> +OPTAB_D (lenstore_optab, "lenstore$a")
Sorry, I should have picked up on this last time, but I think we should
be consistent about whether there's an underscore after “len” or not.
I realise this is just replicating what happens for IFN_MASK_LOAD/
“maskload” and IFN_MASK_STORE/“maskstore”, but it's something I kept
tripping over when implementing those for SVE.
Personally I think it is easier to read with the underscore, so this
would be “len_load_optab” and “len_load$a” (or “len_load_$a”,
there's no real consistency on that). Same for stores.
Thanks,
Richard
