On 12/27/2011 02:12 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
- if (!scope_dependent_p) + if (!dependent_scope_p (scope))
I was thinking to change the line
scope_dependent_p = dependent_type_p (scope);
to use dependent_scope_p instead of dependent_type_p. Jason
On 12/27/2011 02:12 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
- if (!scope_dependent_p) + if (!dependent_scope_p (scope))
I was thinking to change the line
scope_dependent_p = dependent_type_p (scope);
to use dependent_scope_p instead of dependent_type_p. Jason