Hi,
I know it's stage three but I hope this tiny patch which affects only
dumping is still acceptable. In SRA passes I wrote dumping so that
when the detailed dump is not requested, it is quite brief and only
writes the decisions, not how it reached those decisions. Of course,
that means that debugging SRA I make heavy use of detailed dumps.
The slightly annoying thing is that detailed dumps switch on
tree-into-ssa dumps at all, but the really annoying thing is just how
many blank lines it writes into the dump. The function body and my
dumps are quite far apart and can look quite confusing. Yesterday I
got fed up to the level that I wrote the patch below which cuts back
on newlines significantly.
It also adds one to the beginning of update_ssa() so that there always
is a blank line dividing these dumps from whatever there is before
them. Otherwise, it just removes superfluous "\n" stuff.
I actually included this in a bootstrap and testsuite run,
unsurprisingly it caused no issues. OK for trunk now?
Thanks,
Martin
2011-12-20 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz>
* tree-into-ssa.c (rewrite_update_stmt): Do not dump extra newlines.
(rewrite_update_enter_block): Likewise.
(dump_update_ssa): Likewise.
(update_ssa): Likewise but also dump a newline at the beginning.
Index: src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c
+++ src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c
@@ -2051,7 +2051,6 @@ rewrite_update_stmt (gimple stmt, gimple
{
fprintf (dump_file, "Updating SSA information for statement ");
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
- fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
}
/* Rewrite USES included in OLD_SSA_NAMES and USES whose underlying
@@ -2199,7 +2198,7 @@ rewrite_update_enter_block (struct dom_w
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
- fprintf (dump_file, "\n\nRegistering new PHI nodes in block #%d\n\n",
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Registering new PHI nodes in block #%d\n",
bb->index);
/* Mark the unwind point for this block. */
@@ -2848,22 +2847,21 @@ dump_update_ssa (FILE *file)
if (!bitmap_empty_p (SYMS_TO_RENAME (cfun)))
{
- fprintf (file, "\n\nSymbols to be put in SSA form\n\n");
+ fprintf (file, "\nSymbols to be put in SSA form\n");
dump_decl_set (file, SYMS_TO_RENAME (cfun));
fprintf (file, "\n");
}
if (names_to_release && !bitmap_empty_p (names_to_release))
{
- fprintf (file, "\n\nSSA names to release after updating the SSA
web\n\n");
+ fprintf (file, "\nSSA names to release after updating the SSA web\n\n");
EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (names_to_release, 0, i, bi)
{
print_generic_expr (file, ssa_name (i), 0);
fprintf (file, " ");
}
+ fprintf (file, "\n");
}
-
- fprintf (file, "\n\n");
}
@@ -3342,6 +3340,9 @@ update_ssa (unsigned update_flags)
timevar_push (TV_TREE_SSA_INCREMENTAL);
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\nUpdating SSA:\n");
+
if (!update_ssa_initialized_fn)
init_update_ssa (cfun);
gcc_assert (update_ssa_initialized_fn == cfun);
@@ -3506,14 +3507,14 @@ update_ssa (unsigned update_flags)
dump_update_ssa (dump_file);
- fprintf (dump_file, "Incremental SSA update started at block: %d\n\n",
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Incremental SSA update started at block: %d\n",
start_bb->index);
c = 0;
EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (blocks_to_update, 0, i, bi)
c++;
fprintf (dump_file, "Number of blocks in CFG: %d\n", last_basic_block);
- fprintf (dump_file, "Number of blocks to update: %d (%3.0f%%)\n\n",
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Number of blocks to update: %d (%3.0f%%)\n",
c, PERCENT (c, last_basic_block));
if (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)
