Hi!
two-types-6.c never emitted the warning, even in 4.5/4.6, and pr93382.c
doesn't have properly escaped parens, so doesn't check whether they are
literally present in the message.
2020-05-09 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR testsuite/95008
* gcc.dg/two-types-6.c: Remove dg-warning directive that never
triggered.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c: Properly escape ()s in the diagnostic
message.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/two-types-6.c.jj 2020-05-07 21:07:40.518054283
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/two-types-6.c 2020-05-09 20:23:54.490375048 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
/* { dg-options "-std=gnu89" } // suppress default -pedantic-errors */
struct s {
- struct f {} /* { dg-warning "does not declare anything" } */
+ struct f {}
struct g {} x; /* { dg-error "expected ';', identifier or " } */
};
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c.jj 2020-05-07 21:07:40.393056167
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93382.c 2020-05-09 20:18:44.934954103
+0200
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ql (void)
int n1[1];
fread (n1, sizeof (n1[0]), 1, fp); /* { dg-message "'n1' gets an unchecked
value here" } */
- idx = n1[0]; /* { dg-message "'idx' has an unchecked value here (from 'n1')"
} */
+ idx = n1[0]; /* { dg-message "'idx' has an unchecked value here \\\(from
'n1'\\\)" } */
}
int arr[10];
Jakub
