On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> > +               fprintf (mstream, "\t@-touch -r %s %s.tem && mv %s.tem 
> > %s\n",
> > +                        input_name, input_name, input_name, input_name);
> 
> Is touch -r portable?

Should not matter because '-' will prevent errors and errors go to
/dev/null in the patch I committed.  [in the end currently the
rules do not have any inputs, so changing time stamps of the ltrans
inputs shouldn't be an issue]

Richard.

Reply via email to