On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:43 AM Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > on 2020/4/2 上午6:51, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > This caused: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 > > > > Thanks for reporting this. The attached patch is to fix the stupid > mistake by using gsi_insert_seq_before instead of gsi_insert_before. > > BTW, the regression testing on one x86_64 machine from CFarm is > unable to reveal it (I guess due to native arch sandybridge?), so I > specified additional option -march=znver2 and verified the coverage. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu (P9) and > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, also verified the fail cases in related PRs. > > > BR, > Kewen > ----------- > gcc/ChangeLog > > 2020-04-02 Kewen Lin <li...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR tree-optimization/94443 > * tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_live_operation): Use > gsi_insert_seq_before to replace gsi_insert_before. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > 2020-04-02 Kewen Lin <li...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR tree-optimization/94443 > * gcc.dg/vect/pr94443.c: New test. >
I verified that this fixed my bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94449 Thanks. -- H.J.
