Hi!
The following testcase is accepts-invalid since r7-6608-ga56c0ac08242269b.
Before that change we had this
"deduction guide %qD must be declared in the same scope as %qT"
diagnostics for it, after the change it is expected to be diagnosed
in set_decl_namespace at the not_found: label in there. On this testcase
nothing is diagnosed though, because set_decl_namespace isn't called at all,
as in_namespace is NULL.
The following patch restores the old warning but does it only in case we
don't call set_decl_namespace.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Or do you prefer something different?
2020-03-17 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/91759
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Restore old diagnostics about deduction
guide declared in different scope if in_namespace is NULL_TREE.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction72.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/decl.c.jj 2020-03-12 08:26:23.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/decl.c 2020-03-16 16:25:02.142867924 +0100
@@ -9644,6 +9644,15 @@ grokfndecl (tree ctype,
"namespace scope", decl);
return NULL_TREE;
}
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (DECL_NAME (decl));
+ if (in_namespace == NULL_TREE
+ && CP_DECL_CONTEXT (decl) != CP_TYPE_CONTEXT (type))
+ {
+ error_at (location, "deduction guide %qD must be declared in the "
+ "same scope as %qT", decl, type);
+ inform (location_of (type), " declared here");
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ }
if (funcdef_flag)
error_at (location,
"deduction guide %qD must not have a function body", decl);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction72.C.jj 2020-03-16
16:27:03.997068510 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction72.C 2020-03-16
16:28:21.241927835 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/91759
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+namespace N {
+ template <typename T>
+ struct X{ X(int); }; // { dg-message "declared here" }
+}
+
+using N::X;
+
+X(int) -> X<int>; // { dg-error "must be declared in the same scope as" }
Jakub
