On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 11:52, Andreas Krebbel <kreb...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, what system does not have ENOSYS but has ENOTSUP? Meaning the > > !defined ENOSYS > > bit? > > > None that I know about. It is just to make sure the compare afterwards > operates on defined inputs. Ah, I see, indeed. This dance is done also for EOPNOTSUPP, looks good to me (but Jonathan still needs to do the approval).
