On 12/12/2011 09:44 PM, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: > Should we introduce checks for each possible vector datatype (e.g. > vect_8byte_int_available, vect_16byte_int_available, > vect_32byte_int_available, vect_16byte_float_available, > vect_32byte_float_available etc.) along with a check for > prefer_something (e.g. vect_prefer_16byte)? Having such info, we'll be > able to distinguish all the cases, right?
Meh. This seems excruciatingly error prone. I think we should simply re-write the test cases so that it doesn't matter how many times we see a particular string. Don't combine so many (potentially vectorizable) loops within a test case that it matters. r~
