On 2/11/20 7:46 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
[snip]
Since I have to ask again about backports, I've decided to make few more
steps and with Alexander's help created new patch which rewords the
whole option description and covers items (3), (4) and (8). CCing Jakub
and Richard as release managers, also ask Sandra to take a quick look if
new wording is alright. New patch suits all active branches. OK for
10-9-8 ?
I'm not an expert on the content, but the new text reads OK except for
using future tense to describe current behavior. Namely:
+requested complexity. This will slow down the compiler and may only work
s/will slow/slows/
+must be explicitly requested. Disabling assertions will make the compiler
+and runtime slightly faster but increase the risk of undetected internal
s/will make/makes/
s/increase/increases/
+option is specified the stage1 compiler will be built with @samp{yes}
s/will be/is/
OK with those fixes applied.
-Sandra
