On 2/18/20 12:06 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The improved checking of flexible array members committed in r231665
(and later) deliberately excluded anonymous structs and unions
(unnamed members of types with no tags) to allow a harmless extension
that was accepted by G++ prior to the change. However, being overly
broad, the exemption prevents flexible array members that are invalid
for other reasons from being diagnosed in these contexts. That in
turn leads to a subset of such cases causing ICEs downstream.
The attached trivial patch tightens up the conditions under which
this extension is accepted: it only considers such structs when they
are members, thus eliminating the ICE.
The comment says,
Ignore anonymous structs and unions whose members are
considered to be members of the enclosing class and thus will
be diagnosed when checking it.
Certainly if there is no enclosing class this is not the case, so the
patch is an improvement. Do we already properly diagnose an unnamed
struct used to declare a data member?
Jason