Hi, On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Ok. So, I'm happy with your changes and rth already acked the tree-eh.c > side, so can we just get an ack on these cfgexpand.c changes? Thanks. Hmpf, I would have simply committed without a re-approval, but if you think it's necessary I'll wait. FYI, I've actually regstrapped with the patch starting iterating from i+1 in the nested EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP to ignore the diagonal. Ciao, Michael.
