Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:53:27PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> As PR93047 said, __builtin_apply/__builtin_return does not work well with
>> -frename-registers. This is caused by return register(e.g. r3) is used to
>> rename another register, before return register is stored to stack.
>>
>> This patch fix this issue by emitting clobber for those egisters which
>> maybe changed by untyped call.
>
> Yeah. untyped_call does
>
> /* The optimizer does not know that the call sets the function value
> registers we stored in the result block. We avoid problems by
> claiming that all hard registers are used and clobbered at this
> point. */
> emit_insn (gen_blockage ());
>
> but blockage does not say registers are used and clobbered:
>
> @cindex @code{blockage} instruction pattern
> @item @samp{blockage}
> This pattern defines a pseudo insn that prevents the instruction
> scheduler and other passes from moving instructions and using register
> equivalences across the boundary defined by the blockage insn.
> This needs to be an UNSPEC_VOLATILE pattern or a volatile ASM.
>
> Many archs have this same implementation of untyped_call (and of
> blockage, too). It all just works by luck (or it doesn't work).
>
> What we have is:
>
> emit_call_insn (gen_call (operands[0], const0_rtx, const0_rtx));
>
> for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (operands[2], 0); i++)
> {
> rtx set = XVECEXP (operands[2], 0, i);
> emit_move_insn (SET_DEST (set), SET_SRC (set));
> }
>
> ... and nothing in the rtl stream says that those return registers are
> actually set by that call. Maybe we should use gen_call_value? Can we
> ever be asked to return more than a single thing here?
I was also thinking about using "gen_call_value" or "emit_clobber (r3)"
which could generate rtl: "%3:DI=call [foo]" or "call [foo]; clobber
r3". This could tell optimizer that %3 is changed. While there are
potential issues that untyped_call may change other registers. So, mark
clobber for all touched registers maybe more safe.
>
> Some trivial patch comments:
>
>> gcc/
>> 2020-02-05 Jiufu Guo <guoji...@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PR target/93047
>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (untyped_call): add emit_clobber.
>
> "Add", capital.
Thanks,
>
>> gcc/testsuite
>> 2020-02-05 Jiufu Guo <guoji...@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PR target/93047
>> * gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-2.c: New case.
>
> "New test case." (And there is trailing whitespace here; Git warns
> about that, so this won't happen much in the future :-) )
Oh, get it, thanks. The withspace is after this line.
Jiufu
>
>
> Segher
