Hi!

In C++20, types with user-declared constructors are not aggregate types,
while in C++17 only types with user-provided or explicit constructors.
In check_bases_and_members we handle it properly:
  CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE (t)
    |= ((cxx_dialect < cxx2a
         ? type_has_user_provided_or_explicit_constructor (t)
         : TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (t))
        || TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (t));
but for templates the code right now behaves the C++20 way regardless of the
selected standard.

The following patch tweaks finish_struct to match check_bases_and_members.
I had to add !CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE check because
type_has_user_provided_or_explicit_constructor -> user_provided_p ICEd
on inherited ctors represented as USING_DECLs.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2019-12-10  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/92869
        * class.c (finish_struct): For C++17 and earlier, check
        type_has_user_provided_or_explicit_constructor rather than
        TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR whether to set CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr3.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/class.c.jj   2019-12-06 00:40:44.525629037 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/class.c      2019-12-10 14:18:41.171380767 +0100
@@ -7456,7 +7456,13 @@ finish_struct (tree t, tree attributes)
       /* Remember current #pragma pack value.  */
       TYPE_PRECISION (t) = maximum_field_alignment;
 
-      if (TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (t))
+      if (cxx_dialect < cxx2a)
+       {
+         if (!CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE (t)
+             && type_has_user_provided_or_explicit_constructor (t))
+           CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE (t) = 1;
+       }
+      else if (TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (t))
        CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE (t) = 1;
 
       /* Fix up any variants we've already built.  */
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr3.C.jj       2019-12-10 14:25:22.344231923 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr3.C  2019-12-10 14:23:31.700927787 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// PR c++/92869
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A {
+  A () = default;
+  A (const A &) = default;
+  A (A &&) = default;
+  int arr[3];
+};
+
+template <typename T, int N>
+struct B {
+  B () = default;
+  B (const B &) = default;
+  B (B &&) = default;
+  T arr[N];
+};
+
+A a = { { 1, 2, 3 } };         // { dg-error "could not convert" "" { target 
c++2a } }
+B<int, 3> b = { { 1, 2, 3 } }; // { dg-error "could not convert" "" { target 
c++2a } }

        Jakub

Reply via email to