Hi. The patch is about early bail out in gfc_dep_compare_expr function when one of the arguments (and not both at the same time) is null. I'm not sure, it's a proper fix however.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Thanks, Martin gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2019-12-10 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> PR fortran/92874 * dependency.c (gfc_dep_compare_expr): Bail out when one of the arguments is null. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2019-12-10 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> PR fortran/92874 * gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90: New test. --- gcc/fortran/dependency.c | 2 ++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90 | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c index 394d85b48a2..eb741137d60 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ gfc_dep_compare_expr (gfc_expr *e1, gfc_expr *e2) if (e1 == NULL && e2 == NULL) return 0; + else if (e1 == NULL || e2 == NULL) + return -2; e1 = gfc_discard_nops (e1); e2 = gfc_discard_nops (e2); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a1fca3d7718 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr92874.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! { dg-options "-O2" } +! PR fortran/92874 +program p + call s('a') + call s('abc') +end +subroutine s(x) + character(*) :: x + print *, (x(1:1) == x(1:)) +end