> On Dec 5, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> In the relevant session at the GNU Tools Cauldron 2019, Michael Meissner >> stated that even he is not using a 80 x 24 terminal anymore, and that >> should tell us something. ;-) >> >> So, I formally propose that we lift this characters per line restriction >> from IBM punch card (80) to mainframe line printer (132). > > I thought these line lengths were based on readability studies suggesting > lengths that lines shorter than 80 columns were more readable? That's certainly a general rule. There is a reason why books aren't wide, and why newspapers have columns. The eye can't deal well with long lines. So while 132 column lines are certainly possible with modern computers, it doesn't mean they are desirable. paul
- [Patch][OpenMP/OpenACC/Fortran] Fix mapping of optional... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch][OpenMP/OpenACC/Fortran] Fix mapping of... Tobias Burnus
- Re: [Patch][OpenMP/OpenACC/Fortran] Fix mapping of... Jakub Jelinek
- [RFC] Characters per line: from punch card (80... Thomas Schwinge
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from punch ... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from pu... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from punch ... Joseph Myers
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from pu... Paul Koning
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: fr... Jeff Law
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: fr... Florian Weimer
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from pu... Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: fr... Eric Gallager
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: fr... Robin Curtis
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line... James Secan
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line... Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from punch ... Michael Matz
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: from pu... Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [RFC] Characters per line: fr... Marek Polacek