Hi,
for this ICE on invalid, where we crash because we try to set
AGGR_INIT_ZERO_FIRST (ctor) = 1 on the error_mark_node returned by
build_aggr_init_expr, I think it's fine to just move the check like in
the below, because build_aggr_init_expr itself can handle ctor ==
error_mark_node.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///////////////////
/cp
2011-12-06 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/51431
* init.c (build_value_init): Check build_aggr_init_expr return
value for error_mark_node.
/testsuite
2011-12-06 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/51431
* g++.dg/other/abstract3.C: New.
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/51431
+
+struct A // { dg-message "note" }
+{
+ virtual void foo() = 0; // { dg-message "note" }
+};
+
+struct B
+{
+ A a; // { dg-error "abstract" }
+ B() : a() {} // { dg-error "abstract" }
+};
Index: cp/init.c
===================================================================
--- cp/init.c (revision 182041)
+++ cp/init.c (working copy)
@@ -359,11 +359,9 @@ build_value_init (tree type, tsubst_flags_t compla
tree ctor = build_special_member_call
(NULL_TREE, complete_ctor_identifier,
NULL, type, LOOKUP_NORMAL, complain);
+ ctor = build_aggr_init_expr (type, ctor, complain);
if (ctor != error_mark_node)
- {
- ctor = build_aggr_init_expr (type, ctor, complain);
- AGGR_INIT_ZERO_FIRST (ctor) = 1;
- }
+ AGGR_INIT_ZERO_FIRST (ctor) = 1;
return ctor;
}
}