On 11/14/19 7:34 AM, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
Hello

Currently, when choosing a spill register, GCC just picks the first available register in the register class returned by the TAQRGET_SPILL_CLASS hook that doesn't conflict.

On AMD GCN this can cause problems as DImode values stored in SGPRs must start on an even register number and TImode values on a multiple of 4. This is enforced by defining TARGET_HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK to be false when this condition is not satisfied. However, assign_spill_hard_regs does not check TARGET_HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK, so it can assign an unsuitable hard register for the mode. I have fixed this by rejecting spill registers that do not satisfy TARGET_HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK for the largest mode of the spilt register.

Built and tested for an AMD GCN target. This fixes failures in:

gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-9.c
gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-10.c

I have also ensured that the code bootstraps on x86_64, though it currently does not use spill registers.

Okay for trunk?

Spilling into registers of another class was an experimental feature.  On some x86-64 micro-architectures, it resulted in a worse performance code.  But I guess in your case, it is profitable.   I hope after your patches it can be switched on for some x86-64 micro-architectures.

As for the patch, it is OK to commit.  Thank you.

2019-11-14 Kwok Cheung Yeung  <k...@codesourcery.com>

    gcc/
    * lra-spills.c (assign_spill_hard_regs): Check that the spill
    register is suitable for the mode.
---
 gcc/lra-spills.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.c b/gcc/lra-spills.c
index 54f76cc..8fbd3a8 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-spills.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-spills.c
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ assign_spill_hard_regs (int *pseudo_regnos, int n)
       for (k = 0; k < spill_class_size; k++)
     {
       hard_regno = ira_class_hard_regs[spill_class][k];
-      if (TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (eliminable_regset, hard_regno))
+      if (TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (eliminable_regset, hard_regno)
+          || !targetm.hard_regno_mode_ok (hard_regno, mode))
         continue;
       if (! overlaps_hard_reg_set_p (conflict_hard_regs, mode, hard_regno))
         break;


Reply via email to