> Looks good codewise. Seconded, modulo the file: the function should be in cfgrtl.c instead.
> I'm just a bit worried about the name "delete_label". > "delete_insn (label)" should always do the right thing for a pure deletion; > the point of the new routine is that it also moves instructions. It only fixes things up though, so that the RTL stream is valid again. Hence the question: why not retrofit it into delete_insn directly? -- Eric Botcazou
