On 2019/11/6 02:20, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote: > >> Very good point! Since gcc doesn't pursue 100% testsuite pass rate, I >> noticed >> there are a few failures exposed/caused by some PRs all the time. Could we >> just leave the test case there without any pre workaround till the PR get >> fixed? > > Yes, leaving the test as-is would be typical in GCC (though there is also > an argument for XFAILing and filing bugs to try to keep the baseline > testsuite state clean and instead use only Bugzilla to track known > regressions). >
Committed to r277872 to fix part of the failures except the ICE case atomics-exec-5.c. Peter Bergner has a stand alone test to reproduce it. It may be fixed it soon. Xiong Hu Thanks
