On 9/26/19 10:45 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Original thread starts here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01185.html
OK to commit?
As Steve, I am not really happy about adding yet another option and
especially not about legacy features. On the other hand, I see that
legacy code is still used.
Having said this, the patch is OK from my side.
Tobias
PS: I was also not that happy about the BOZ changes by Steve, which
broke code here – but, fortunately, adding int( ,kind=) around it was
sufficient and that code was supposed to be F2003 standard conforming.
I could ping the authors and is now fixed. Still, I wonder how much code
broke due to that change; code is not that simple to fix. – But, in
general, I am very much in favour in having valid Fortran 2018 code (can
be fixed form, old and use old features, that's fine).
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
Mark Eggleston <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
* invoke.texi: Add -Wno-overwrite-recursive to list of options. Add
description of -Wno-overwrite-recursive. Fix typo in description
of -Winteger-division.
* lang.opt: Add option -Woverwrite-recursive initialised as on.
* option.c (gfc_post_options): Output warning only if it is enabled.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Mark Eggleston <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
* gfortran.dg/no_overwrite_recursive_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/no_overwrite_recursive_2.f90: New test.
