On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:36:41PM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > Am 06.09.2019 um 12:34 schrieb Segher Boessenkool > > <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>: > > Should you handle -fsignaling-nans here as well? > > Do you mean disabling vectorisation of LE/LT/GE/GT/LTGT when > -fsignaling-nans is in effect? This makes sense to me.
I meant it sounds like you need to do *something* more than the generic code does, here. > I could do that > here, but wouldn't common code (e.g. expand_vec_cond_expr_p) be a better > place? If it can be done there, all the better, sure. Anyway, this is a separate issue, don't let me distract you :-) Segher
