On 9/24/19 11:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Curious: even if you found the issue on a s390x target, shouldn't this
> (presumably generic?) test case live in a generic place instead of
> 'gcc.target/s390/'?
Sure, that's logical and I've just tested that locally on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
>
>
> Grüße
> Thomas
>From cb3f2ae1b00129dae4854e370b1049e8d2f01f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:31:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Move a target test-case to generic folder.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-09-24 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* gcc.target/s390/pr91014.c: Move to ...
* gcc.dg/pr91014.c: ... this.
---
gcc/testsuite/{gcc.target/s390 => gcc.dg}/pr91014.c | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.target/s390 => gcc.dg}/pr91014.c (100%)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr91014.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr91014.c
similarity index 100%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr91014.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr91014.c
--
2.23.0
