On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:07 PM Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > this fixes a test case where a short string constant is put in a larger > memory object. > > The consistency check in varasm.c is failed because both types should agree. > > Since the failed assertion is just a gcc_checking_assert I think a back-port > of this fix > to the gcc-9 branch will not be necessary. > > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > Is it OK for trunk? > > > Thanks > Bernd.
Ok. -- Janne Blomqvist
