Hi Jeff, On 09/09/2019 19:55, Jeff Law wrote: > I'm not sure if we really want to expose this as a first class option. > Perhaps a PARAM would be better. Jan would have the final call though > since he's done the most work on the IPA bits.
Many thanks for the suggestion - I could turn it into a pair of integer params (one to increase the growth and one to decrease it) - would that still be suitable? (I think there's no easy way to have a param with as signed value, but am I missing something obvious?) Best regards, Graham.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
