On 9/9/19 5:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/09/19 15:45 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland via libstdc++ wrote:
Here is a patch to the libstdc++ docs re constexpr additions. They
reflect the latest macro assignments AFAICT.
Constexpr interator reqs are implemented in 9.1, the rest for 10.1.
Ok?
Should I bother adding the Constexpr interator requirements to the
gcc-9 branch docs?
Yes please, it would be good to have that part in the gcc-9 docs. No
need to regen the HTML on the branch at this time though.
Thanks
Ok,
I committed the attached for gcc-9.
Ed
2019-09-09 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Update docs for p858 - Constexpr iterator changes available since 9.1.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml: Update p0858r0 status.
Index: doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml (revision 275522)
+++ doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml (working copy)
@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@
</row>
<row>
- <?dbhtml bgcolor="#C8B0B0" ?>
<entry> Constexpr iterator requirements </entry>
<entry>
<link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xlink:href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0858r0.html">
@@ -316,8 +315,9 @@
P0858R0
</link>
</entry>
- <entry align="center"> </entry>
- <entry />
+ <entry align="center"> 9.1 </entry>
+ <entry> <code>__cpp_lib_string_view >= 201803L</code>
+ and <code>__cpp_lib_array_constexpr >= 201803L</code> </entry>
</row>
<row>