On 9/9/19 5:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 05/09/19 15:45 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland via libstdc++ wrote:
Here is a patch to the libstdc++ docs re constexpr additions. They reflect the latest macro assignments AFAICT.

Constexpr interator reqs are implemented in 9.1, the rest for 10.1.

Ok?

Should I bother adding the Constexpr interator requirements to the gcc-9 branch docs?

Yes please, it would be good to have that part in the gcc-9 docs. No
need to regen the HTML on the branch at this time though.

Thanks

Ok,

I committed the attached for gcc-9.

Ed


2019-09-09  Edward Smith-Rowland  <3dw...@verizon.net>

        Update docs for p858 - Constexpr iterator changes available since 9.1.
        * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml: Update p0858r0 status.

Index: doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
===================================================================
--- doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml   (revision 275522)
+++ doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml   (working copy)
@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@
     </row>
 
     <row>
-      <?dbhtml bgcolor="#C8B0B0" ?>
       <entry>  Constexpr iterator requirements </entry>
       <entry>
         <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; 
xlink:href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0858r0.html";>
@@ -316,8 +315,9 @@
        P0858R0
        </link>
       </entry>
-      <entry align="center"> </entry>
-      <entry />
+      <entry align="center"> 9.1 </entry>
+      <entry> <code>__cpp_lib_string_view &gt;= 201803L</code>
+      and <code>__cpp_lib_array_constexpr &gt;= 201803L</code> </entry>
     </row>
 
     <row>

Reply via email to