On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: > Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as > >> well. > > > > powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good. > > Thanks for the confirmation. However, Andreas Tobler pointed out in > private mail that I'd missed to reference rs6000/t-linux64 during the > libgcc migration. Strange that this seems to have no ill effect.
Hmm, yeah, we should have that back in. Lack of t-linux64 means we get all the soft-fp functions that we never use, bloating libgcc. Also, -mno-minimal-toc gives better code. Even when -mminimal-toc wouldn't be in force anyway the option selects -mcmodel=small. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
