> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:22:46AM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> > --- a/configure
> > +++ b/configure
> > @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ infodir
> > docdir
> > oldincludedir
> > includedir
> > +runstatedir
> > localstatedir
> > sharedstatedir
> > sysconfdir
>
> (etc.)
>
> You seem to have generated this with the wrong version of autoxxxx, or
> the wrong options, or the previous version was. Please check? Or, what
> else caused this change?
My experience is that this is a commonly added patch to the system
autoconf binary, e.g. /usr/bin/autoconf. So you need to build your
own autoconf from the FSF sources to get an exact match. Or maybe use
a different linux distro that doesn't modify autoconf. But personally
I just build my own autoconf binaries to avoid this problem.
Yeah by mistake I used a Debian patched autoconf 2.96. Will regenerate
using vanilla autoconf for subsequent versions of the patch.
- [PATCH 8/8] bpf: add myself as the maintainer for the e... Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 5/8] bpf: make target-supports.exp aware of eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 4/8] bpf: gcc.target eBPF testsuite Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 7/8] bpf: manual updates for eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 6/8] bpf: adjust GCC testsuite to eBPF limitatio... Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC David Malcolm
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC ... Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC ... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Richard Sandiford
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi
