Mikael Morin wrote:
This is not a bug nor a regression, so this should normally wait for the next stage1. It is obvious on the other hand, and safe, as the 'n< loop->dimen' conditions are inside a 'for (n = 0; n< loop->dimen; n++)' loop.Regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (with the just posted pr51250 patch). OK for trunk?
OK. Thanks for the clean up. Tobias
