> On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:35 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> 
>> wrote:
>> 
> ...
>>>>> As far as GCC conversion goes, below is what I plan to do and what not to 
>>>>> do.  This is based on comments from everyone in this thread:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Construct GCC's git repo from SVN using same settings as current git 
>>>>> mirror.
>>>>> 2. Compare the resulting git repo with current GCC mirror -- they should 
>>>>> match on the commit hash level for trunk, branches/gcc-*-branch, and 
>>>>> other "normal" branches.
>>>>> 3. Investigate any differences between converted GCC repo and current GCC 
>>>>> mirror. These can be due to bugs in git-svn or other misconfigurations.
>>>>> 4. Import git-only branches from current GCC mirror.
>>>>> 5. Publish this "raw" repo for community to sanity-check its contents.
>>>> 
>>>> Why not start from the current mirror?  Perhaps a mirror of the mirror?
>>> 
>>> To check that git-svn is self-consistent and generates same commits now as 
>>> it was several years ago when you setup the current mirror.  
>> 
>> Unfortunately, current mirror does not and could not account for rewrites of 
>> SVN commit log messages.  For trunk the histories of diverge in 2008 due to 
>> commit message change of r138154.  This is not a single occurrence; I've 
>> compared histories only of trunk and gcc-6-branch, and both had commit 
>> message change (for gcc-6-branch see r259978).
>> 
>> It's up to the community is to weigh pros and cons of re-using existing GCC 
>> mirror as conversion base vs regenerating history from scratch:
>> 
>> Pros of using GCC mirror:
>> + No need to rebase public git-only branches
>> + No need to rebase private branches
>> + No need to rebase current clones, checkouts, work-in-progress trees
>> 
>> Cons of using GCC mirror:
>> - Poor author / committer IDs (this breaks patch statistics software)
>> - Several commit messages will not be the current "fixed" version
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Ping?
> 
> Meanwhile, status update:
> 
> 1. GitHub blocked https://github.com/maxim-kuvyrkov/gcc/ due to excessive 
> resource usage. I've asked them to unblock and explained why pushes are as 
> big as they are.
> 
> 2. I'm uploading to https://git.linaro.org/people/maxim.kuvyrkov/gcc.git/ for 
> now.

The correct link is https://git.linaro.org/people/maxim-kuvyrkov/gcc.git/ .  
Thanks to Segher for pointing this out.

> 
> 3. Conversion is now feature-complete.  The scripts re-write author and 
> committer fields, as well as create proper git tags.
> 
> 4. "Raw" version of repository is available under refs/raw/*.
> 
> 5. refs/raw/* are not expected to change.
> 
> 6. refs/heads/* and refs/tags/* might change due to author/committer name 
> fixes and improvements.
> 
> Please scrutinize the repo and let me know of any artifacts.


--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org

Reply via email to