On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:16:31PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:42:15 -0500
> Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Ok, yes a DEFHOOKPOD or similar sounds like a good idea, I'll look into 
> > > this
> > > alternative.  
> > 
> > What is that, like target macros?  But with some indirection?
> 
> Yes its for target macros, it looks like the "POD" in DEFHOOKPOD stands for
> "piece-of-data", i.e. the hook represents a variable rather than function.

But it is data, not a constant, so it does not allow optimising based
on its potentially constant value?  Where "potentially" in this case
means "always" :-/


Segher

Reply via email to