On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:16:31PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:42:15 -0500 > Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > > Ok, yes a DEFHOOKPOD or similar sounds like a good idea, I'll look into > > > this > > > alternative. > > > > What is that, like target macros? But with some indirection? > > Yes its for target macros, it looks like the "POD" in DEFHOOKPOD stands for > "piece-of-data", i.e. the hook represents a variable rather than function.
But it is data, not a constant, so it does not allow optimising based on its potentially constant value? Where "potentially" in this case means "always" :-/ Segher