On 7/2/19 7:15 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Martin Liška wrote: > >> After the discussion with Richi and Nathan, I made a place in >> tree_function_decl >> and I rebased the original Dominik's patch on top of that. > > So, last time there were some questions about the legality of this > transformation. Did you change the exact set of functions on which this is > applied?
Yes. I was not included in the original discussion, but I hope the transformation is valid. Btw. clang also removes the new/delete pairs and I guess it was the original motivation of the patch. Martin Or has there been a clarification in the standard saying that this is ok? (or were we mistaken the first time to believe that there might be an issue?) >
