Iain Sandoe <[email protected]> writes:
> well ... what about this instead then?
That one should at least be no worse than the current situation :-)
> Index: gcc/defaults.h
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/defaults.h (revision 181476)
> +++ gcc/defaults.h (working copy)
> @@ -392,6 +392,14 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respect
> #endif
> #endif
>
> +/* If we have named sections, provide a name for the transaction clone
> + table section. */
> +#if defined (TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION)
I suggest using #ifdef for single-condition tests; it's less chatty and
thus easier to read (again below).
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
