On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:26:27PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> @@ -36379,6 +36391,7 @@ static struct rs6000_opt_mask const
> >> rs6000_opt_masks[] =
> >> { "power9-vector", OPTION_MASK_P9_VECTOR, false,
> >> true },
> >> { "powerpc-gfxopt", OPTION_MASK_PPC_GFXOPT, false,
> >> true },
> >> { "powerpc-gpopt", OPTION_MASK_PPC_GPOPT, false,
> >> true },
> >> + { "prefixed-addr", OPTION_MASK_PREFIXED_ADDR, false,
> >> true },
> > Do we want this? Why?
>
> Performance folks are using it for testing purposes. Eventually this
> will probably drop out, but for now I think it's best to have the
> undocumented switch.
Command-line options, sure, but is that what this code is about? Huh.
I thought it was for attribute target and that stuff.
Oh well, okay either way. For now :-)
Segher
